1776
Christmas means multiple viewings of A
Christmas Story. Easter calls for Godspell. And for me,
Independence Day requires a viewing of 1776. Or at least sometime during
the week of July 4th. Or maybe a week before; or after. For me, this year, the annual viewing was on Sunday
the 7th.
Though the film is NOT perfect (I could list all the items I would have liked to have seen, but no one likes an armchair director/producer), the cast IS. There's not a weak link anywhere, which is pretty amazing.
Though the film is NOT perfect (I could list all the items I would have liked to have seen, but no one likes an armchair director/producer), the cast IS. There's not a weak link anywhere, which is pretty amazing.
Although
I did not see the original production (William Daniels, Ken Howard, Betty Buckley!) I envy those who did! I've been lucky
enough to see two stage versions. The 1997 revival with Brent Spiner who
was an excellent John Adams. (Who knew the man could sing?) I
wish I could say the same of the late Pat Hingle, who might have been the right
build for Ben Franklin, but carried none of the fun that Howard Da Silva
conveyed in the movie version. And so I also assume in the Broadway production
in which he appeared briefly, sidetracked by heart issues early in the run, his
understudy Rex Everhart took over and can be heard on the original Broadway
recording. It is my understanding that Mr. Everhart was also the
understudy for Franklin during the revival. I truly wish I had seen him
in the role instead of Mr. Hingle.) I also saw the show more recently (10
years ago) and locally at the Paper Mill Playhouse. Though there I saw
what I felt was a weak John Adams, Conrad John Shuck (if you are a kid of
the 1970s you might remember him from Macmillan and Wife or more infamously,
playing the robot in Holmes and YoYo) was a brilliant Franklin and the Griffin
Matthews gave the most heartfelt and moving versions of "Mama Look
Sharp" I have ever heard. I also have to mention that James Barbour
sang a chilling version of "Molasses to Rum To Slaves" that rivaled
John Cullum's version from the movie. It goes without saying that I am
eagerly anticipating the show's return to Broadway in 2021. (I better
start saving now! I'd for the three of us to have seats in the
orchestra!)
One
of the things that I love about the show (be it the film or stage production)
is that it is honest and entertaining. These men (there are only 2 women
in the cast) are not characters in a history book, but are HUMAN. Something
that we seem to forget. Or as John Adams says: "It doesn't matter. I
won't be in the history books anyway, only you. Franklin did this and Franklin
did that and Franklin did some other damn thing. Franklin smote the ground and
out sprang George Washington, fully grown and on his horse. Franklin then
electrified him with his miraculous lightning rod and the three of them -
Franklin, Washington, and the horse - conducted the entire revolution by
themselves." Don't we dangerously put historical figures into mythical status where they can do no wrong?
The show reminds us that history is real. History is not a story; it is flesh and blood. It is often quite ugly. Below is just one example of the skilled writing and brutal honesty of the time.
The show reminds us that history is real. History is not a story; it is flesh and blood. It is often quite ugly. Below is just one example of the skilled writing and brutal honesty of the time.
"Edward
Rutledge: Oh, really. Mr. Adams is now calling our black slaves
"Americans!" Are they, now?
John
Adams: Yes, they are. They are people, and they are here. If there's any
other requirement, I haven't heard it.
Edward
Rutledge: They are here, yes, but they are not people sir, they are
property.
Thomas
Jefferson: No, sir they are people who are being treated as property! I
tell you, the rights of human nature are deeply wounded by this infamous
practice!
Edward
Rutledge: Then see to your own wounds Mr. Jefferson, for you are a
practitioner are you not?
Thomas
Jefferson: I have already resolved to release my slaves.
Edward
Rutledge: Oh. Then I'm sorry, for you've also resolved the ruination of
your own personal economy.
John
Adams: Economy. Always economy. There's more to this than a filthy
purse-string, Rutledge! It is an offense against man and God!
Hopkins: It's
a stinking business, Eddie, a stinking business!
Edward
Rutledge: Is it really now, Mr. Hopkins? Then what's that I smell floating
down from the North? Could it be the aroma of hy-pocrisy? For who holds the
other end of that filthy purse-string, Mr. Adams? Our northern brethren are
feeling a bit tender toward our black slaves. They don't keep slaves! Oh, no.
But they are willing to be considerable carriers of slaves to others."
It's
not pretty. But it IS accurate. It is a reminder of the give and take; of
the compromise that was necessary to create a new country. It
reminds us that the creation of our country was not unlike childbirth. It
was harsh and painful; it came out bloody and crying. But with love and
care; it was and SHOULD be a thing of beauty.
Personally,
I think the movie, or better yet, the stage play, should be required
viewing. Every citizen; every one who wants to be a citizen should see
it. It should be shown annually to every member of congress...perhaps
they could learn something about what they SHOULD be doing. (Or maybe
that is expecting too much?) Though a musical and does take some
historical liberties (Martha Jefferson did not visit her husband in
Philadelphia), the vast majority of the show is historically accurate.
Even the songs have lyrics that were taken from historical documents.
("Is Anybody There?" uses passages from a letter written by John
Adams to his wife on July 2, 1776.) It is a deeply moving look into the
creation of our country.
Don't we ALL need to be reminded of WHY we celebrate July 4th? Don't we all need to be reminded about the foundation of the USA and WHY it is so important to continue to move forward based on the principles set forth by those brave, yet utterly human men 243 years ago?
Comments
Post a Comment