SOMWaD: CCRAP Numbers
In 4th grade, which was the first CCRAP experience we had my son
performed at Level 4 for Language Arts and Literacy. His score was 3
points over the Level 4 cut off. His math performance was at Level 3,
which is obviously not as good as Level 4. Supposedly that means he was
approaching expectations. (Who's expectations, I'm not exactly sure.)
His score was just a few points under what it would have taken to be
Level 4. (So he was just shy of achieving the "Met
Expectations" level.)
In 5th grade, his
second year of CCRAP he performed at Level 4 for Language Arts and Literacy.
This time his number was slightly higher. Moving towards the middle
of the "Met Expectations" range, but not close to the Exceeded
Expectations. In Math, he was still at the Level 3 but higher than the
year before (but not by much.)
In reviewing the
school, district and state averages for this past year, I see that in Language Arts
and Literacy he is above the all the averages and in Math he is slightly below.
(He is much more above score wise, in Language Arts and Literacy when it
comes to averages, than he is below in Math averages.)
What does any of
this mean? Absolutely nothing. Spend one day with my kid in school
and you could have predicted exactly what these "scores" supposedly
told me. He's slightly above average in one realm and slightly below
average in another. Academically, he is NOT incredibly gifted, nor is he
in need of any special assistance. CCCRAP tells me what I have known all
along; he is an average kid.
Period.
Two years; two
CCRAP tests. He's average. He's not extraordinary. (At least
according to their metric.) He's a kid. An average kid.
So what is the
point of this test? I could have told you what the results
"said" years before. Every teacher who has ever had him as a
student could probably say the same thing. And I'm betting that for as
many CCRAP test as he may take in his life, he will continue to have the same
results.
The test is pretty
much pointless. The "results" tell me what I already know.
And what the results don't say is that my kid is generally good, kind,
caring and thoughtful. These are all things that in addition to
educational skills will shape the adult that he is to become.
So if this test
isn't telling me (and anyone else) anything new about my kid. If it isn't
helping him in any way that I can see. (If is supposed to, I don't see
it, so please point it out.) Isn't it time to cut the CCRAP and get back
to basics?
Let teachers
teach. Have parents parent. Most importantly, let kids be kids.
(Which I have come to realize sometimes means having a messy house while
the kid goes outside to play with his friends instead of forcing him to clean
up the mess that he invariably made.)
Kids doing kid
things. That's NOT CCRAP. In fact, it just might be more
educational than any test anyone could give.
As my son would
say: ya think?
Unfortunately, this is the federal government at work. Schools get extra funding for doing what the government tells them to do and the testing is part of it. We don't have the CCRAPs, we have "state tests" at the 3-8 grade levels and then Regent's exams at the high school level (of which they are required to pass a certain number in specific subjects in order to graduate). I am with you - let the teachers teach, that's why they paid all that money for college.
ReplyDelete